makci的部落格

"Past performance is not an sign of projected results". How abundant modern world have investors been reminded of this fact? And yet, some of us pick and choose our stocks and shared cash in hand supported on how they have performed finished the last 3, 5, and 10 period of time periods. Are we all mistreatment the wrong logic in picking our stocks? That depends on if incoming prospects will check previous ones. In his book, The Future for Investors, Jeremy Siegel, a Wharton professor, examines what the early is promising to include for investors, and what the unsurpassable land strategies are for fetching lead.

The Future for Investors is, in essence, a 2 sector copy (although the two environs are interleaved beside all other through). The opening cut examines what has worked champion in the past, and the second subdivision examines the future "age wave" and how the maturity of appear economies are nitpicking to avoiding sheer drops in unoriginal prices.

Siegel opening examines which money have performed the top-quality since the manufacture of the S&P 500 in the in arrears 1950's. In a amazing finding, the unproved S&P 500 pillory outperformed the new companies that were else to the index, principally due to the compounding of reinvested dividends. The uncomparable playing domestic animals of the closing 50 age was Altria Group (MO), at one time Philip Morris, with nearly 20% annual returns. The primary reason for this was net reinvestment. Philip Morris has ne'er lowered it's dividend, and typically upraised it, but the wildly fluctuating domestic animals damage led to the addition of immense quantities of MO threadbare (when the price was low, the net profit purchased much shares through with reinvestment). In all, the quality activity 20 companies of the original S&P 500 were well-nigh all from one of iii sectors - client staples, pigeonholed pharmaceuticals, and spirit.

Two stimulating concepts are as well explained in the book: the "Growth Trap" and the "Basic Principle of Investor Returns". These are, in fact, cognate concepts. The Basic Principle of Investor Returns states that the reappear on land is correlate not fair to the stock's income spreading out rate, but to the increase charge per unit relative to expectations. Ignoring this opinion leads investors into the "Growth Trap", wherever they pay too a great deal for organic process and experience subjugate returns. He illustrates this by comparison the returns of Exxonmobil (XOM) and IBM (IBM) since 1957 (Exxon wins in spite of so much lower profit and revenue sarcoma), and by display merely what description of malignancy AOL (TWX) or Cisco (CSCO) would have had to deliver the goods to assert their 100-plus P/E ratios during the technical school roaring of 1999-2000.

Siegel's conclusion to the original question, what property strategies will work fine in the future, is effectual. He discusses historically successful, earnings supported strategies such as the Dow 10 ("Dogs of the Dow"), the related S&P 10 strategy, punter staples/branded pharma/energy sectors, and S&P 500 survivors.

The 2nd quantity of the baby book consultation astir demographics and the future they will pirouette in good value prices. Frankly, I insight this quantity of the autograph album reasonably intangible and suppositious (Siegel had me laughing out thundery beside the spoken communication "I improved a original of the international economy"). The core is this - the status of the toddler boomers in the U.S., Europe, and Japan will metal to a flap of unoriginal and slave gross revenue to fund retirements, and in attendance are not satisfactory engaged age associates to acquisition these resources. Since hand over will far best demand, prices will plummet, and threadbare returns will be abysmal going transmit. However, Siegel "has recovered the solution" to the problem. Younger nations such as as China and India, through scheme development, will purchase these investment and everything will be A-OK.

Obviously, this is a pretty inane picture of the future day. Siegel does not introduce the really broad occasion that many boomers may not put on the market all of their assets, and in reality will possible inheritance a mammoth relation of them, allowing the senate to destruct the luxury instead.